|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 05:09 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Liam won??????. You can view the original
here. Whoever said pigs couldn't fly.
[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 05:09 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Liam won??????. You can view the original
here. Whoever said pigs couldn't fly.
[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 05:13 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by election results. You can view the original
here. The complete results are posted at www.feds.ca.[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 05:18 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by mr t. You can view the original
here. So how does this compare with previous years in terms of turnout?
Seems a bit higher to me.[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 05:20 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by jesse. You can view the original
here. At least on council. Matthew Campbell and Alex Sloat both lost!
Oh well, I'm sure that's not the last UW has heard from them. [ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 05:28 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by shit. You can view the original
here. Look how close VPAF was - if the 289 votes had gone to any of the runners-up, they would have won. Tracy only lost by 12 votes! But Rob and Rob also could have won if the decliners voted for them![ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 08:51 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Alex Sloat. You can view the original
here. ...is apparently not going to be eligeble to take the seat, since his Feds job will keep him from being a full-time student, which will make him ineligeble to hold his Senate seat. Funny, no?[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Friday, February 14 2003 @ 11:58 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Curious. You can view the original
here. I'm not really sure on the election process and rules, and I'd like to point out that I'm not looking to get anybody in trouble or to make anybody look badly, but I've got a question that's been bothering me for a few days now that I hope somebody can answer for me.
I saw on Tuesday (I think it was) a candidate in the election was outside of AL handing out flyers and giving away candy and hot chocolate. This was after voting had already begun. Is this allowed to do? I was under the impression that after voting begins, you're not allowed to actively campagn in such a way as that. Can somebody clearify that for me? Again, I'm not looking to get anybody in trouble, I'm just curious about the rules.
Thanks. [ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Saturday, February 15 2003 @ 07:50 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Guy LaMark. You can view the original
here. Rob R lost again! I can't comprehend this. It boggles the mind. He's like the Joe Clark of Waterloo![ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Monday, February 17 2003 @ 10:11 AM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Gardner. You can view the original
here. I hope Edey's presidency is less biased than his work with imprint.
[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Thursday, February 20 2003 @ 07:25 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by Ian MacKinnon. You can view the original
here. It's nice to see a group photo of the new FEDS exec on UWS, but the exec-elect look rather cold, especially Liam and Chris. If all were to catch the flu at the same time, what would the charter state about the succession of the presidency?[ Parent ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: uws archive on Sunday, February 23 2003 @ 04:53 PM CST |
This is an archived comment posted by WPIRG loser. You can view the original
here. what a splendid mosaic our country is. It would only be more perfect if they were all dead white men. [ Parent ]
|
|
)
